Review: Bad Science by Ben Goldacre
Jun. 4th, 2009 06:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
***** (out of *****)
Bad Science is Ben Goldacre's passionate, poignant and entertaining look at science reporting in the media and how people at large are suffering from this. He also has an (occasionally very sharp) axe to grind with the people and industries that have benefited from the same phenomenon, but that is not the focus of the book. The chapter on Patrick Holford descends into a rant, but hey, it's a hugely enjoyable, articulate rant, so who cares? There's also a moving chapter on a nutritionist named Matthias Rath who peddles vitamins to HIV sufferers in South Africa and encourages them to give up their antiretroviral drugs (ugh).
Apart from the few cases mentioned above, Goldacre's problem is not with individuals, but with the media's role in science today. He tries very hard to show the reader how to look for signs of problems in research and reports, as well as exposing "big pharma"'s role in medical research. The result is a book that is accessible to people like me, and I enjoyed it a lot.
Goldacre's blog (largely a mirror of his Guardian articles) is here.
Bad Science is Ben Goldacre's passionate, poignant and entertaining look at science reporting in the media and how people at large are suffering from this. He also has an (occasionally very sharp) axe to grind with the people and industries that have benefited from the same phenomenon, but that is not the focus of the book. The chapter on Patrick Holford descends into a rant, but hey, it's a hugely enjoyable, articulate rant, so who cares? There's also a moving chapter on a nutritionist named Matthias Rath who peddles vitamins to HIV sufferers in South Africa and encourages them to give up their antiretroviral drugs (ugh).
Apart from the few cases mentioned above, Goldacre's problem is not with individuals, but with the media's role in science today. He tries very hard to show the reader how to look for signs of problems in research and reports, as well as exposing "big pharma"'s role in medical research. The result is a book that is accessible to people like me, and I enjoyed it a lot.
Goldacre's blog (largely a mirror of his Guardian articles) is here.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-04 08:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-09 09:11 am (UTC)His take on Gillian McKeith and Patrick Holford fascinated me, because as a vegan I have to be pretty health-conscious in my eating, and I have taken various bits and bobs of their advice over the years. I always ignored the expensive bespoke pills, though, which are what Goldacre really takes issue with.
I don't know how high-profile Holford is these days, but Gillian McKeith's tv shows have a pretty large audience, and it's easy to understand why: the western world is obsessed with food and dieting, and the people she bullies under her wing really are transformed after a few months of eating healthily (of course, she picks the people with the worst possible habits, otherwise the viewing wouldn't be as interesting!).
uSzTdyXXIcNRQQLNEGu
Date: 2011-10-05 02:33 pm (UTC)